PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
42.26%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
47.98%
Cost growth of 47.98% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
33.62%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.08%
Margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
31.33%
R&D change of 31.33% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.63%
Operating expenses change of 32.63% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
43.85%
Total costs change of 43.85% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.19%
D&A change of 12.19% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
24.89%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.46%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
37.12%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.61%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.02%
Income change of 33.02% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-6.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.02%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.01%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.50%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.51%
Share count change of 1.51% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.