PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
34.52%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
34.95%
Cost growth of 34.95% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
33.80%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.32%
R&D change of 0.32% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.35%
Operating expenses change of 8.35% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
28.35%
Total costs change of 28.35% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.85%
D&A change of 23.85% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
69.40%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.69%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.60%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.11%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-31.21%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 322.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
63.05%
Income change of 63.05% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
21.21%
Margin change of 21.21% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
63.04%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
63.05%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 6.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
80.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 6.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.13%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.21%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.