PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.04%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.17%
Cost growth less than half of TSM's 39359.22%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
11.76%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.89%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 29511.76%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.32%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.66%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 105134.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
17.76%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 47699.42%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.07%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.82%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TSM's 123.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.99%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 126.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.92%
Operating income growth below 50% of TSM's 106.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.67%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 106.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.61%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.32%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of TSM's 48919.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.33%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 49961.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.32%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 96.75%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.32%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
27.78%
EPS growth 50-75% of TSM's 40.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 40.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.98%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 12.72% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
3.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 12.72%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.