PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.71%
Revenue growth below 50% of TSM's 20.41%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.79%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 8.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.96%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TSM's 45.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.19%
Margin expansion below 50% of TSM's 21.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.96%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 8.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1574.30%
Other expenses change of 1574.30% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
69.97%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.08%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 5.58%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.91%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-650.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.88%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-912.75%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 78.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-907.05%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 48.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.70%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 135.91%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-748.05%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 95.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-743.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 62.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.30%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 338.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1025.69%
Net income decline while TSM shows 86.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1019.20%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 54.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-966.67%
EPS decline while TSM shows 111.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-966.67%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 111.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.68%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.15%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.