PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.64%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.49%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-21.56%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.38%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.60%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.33%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.32%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.75%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 8.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.87%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 17.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.28%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 159.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.23%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 26.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 36.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-61.23%
Net income decline while TSM shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.11%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 21.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
EPS decline while TSM shows 37.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 37.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.32%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.