PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.72%
Revenue growth 50-75% of TSM's 10.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
6.71%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 2.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
3.20%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TSM's 23.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.38%
Margin decline while TSM shows 11.15% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.33%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.42%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.46%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 2.40%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.48%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.30%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 13.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.39%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-37.64%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 28.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.01%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 15.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-583.39%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 110.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-79.17%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 32.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.30%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 19.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.98%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 163.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-73.68%
Net income decline while TSM shows 29.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.10%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 16.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.92%
EPS decline while TSM shows 29.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 29.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.89%
Share count change of 0.89% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.85%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.