PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.87%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.12%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
3.04%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TSM's 5.56%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
6.08%
Margin expansion 50-75% of TSM's 8.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-1.45%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 19.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 74.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.05%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 1.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.29%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 54.65%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.33%
Similar EBITDA growth to TSM's 14.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-11.19%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 29.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.04%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.62%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
124.81%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
372.70%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
386.67%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
359.40%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
280.21%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
291.44%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.68%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.69% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.