PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.07%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.28%
Cost growth 50-75% of TSM's 0.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
8.43%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.20%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.21%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.67%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.13%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.29%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
53.22%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.24%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.24%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
34.25%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.23%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.24%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
39.13%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.43%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.97%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.70%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.