PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.55%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 3.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.39%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
3.51%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TSM's 9.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.14%
Similar margin change to TSM's 5.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-0.12%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 10.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.63%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 21.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.54%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 1.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
34.37%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 11.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.48%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.06%
Operating income growth 50-75% of TSM's 7.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.71%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.35%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.84%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-35.33%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 14.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.13%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 6.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.95%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.63%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.18%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.28%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.