176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.50%
Similar revenue growth to TSM's 1.57%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-0.57%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 5.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.89%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.34%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.47%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.92%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.46%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 3.00%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.02%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 1.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.08%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.23%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.76%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.29%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-12.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.51%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.65%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.