PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.60%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.59%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.73%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.88%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.12%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 23.38%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.96%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 70.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.84%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 1.50%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.99%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 50.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
44.67%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.30%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.04%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.60%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TSM's 519.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
50.26%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.36%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of TSM's 480.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.26%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.26%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.36%
Net margin growth below 50% of TSM's 519.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.50%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.67%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.35%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.42%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.