PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.84%
Revenue growth below 50% of TSM's 14.91%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.60%
Cost growth less than half of TSM's 5.58%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.17%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TSM's 30.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.33%
Margin expansion below 50% of TSM's 13.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.96%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 8.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.38%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 10.46%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.82%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 6.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.74%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.84%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 15.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.66%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.84%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 37.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.63%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 19.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 33.60%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.33%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 39.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.12%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 20.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.32%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 119.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.33%
Net income decline while TSM shows 34.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.12%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 17.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.33%
EPS decline while TSM shows 30.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.63%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 30.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.66%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.22%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 2.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.