PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.35%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 17.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
23.08%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.31%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TSM's 24.99%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-4.22%
Margin decline while TSM shows 6.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.59%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 7.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.20%
Similar operating expenses growth to TSM's 11.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
18.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.40%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.40%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.75%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 15.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.75%
Similar operating income growth to TSM's 29.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.85%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TSM's 10.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.06%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.78%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 20.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.87%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to TSM's 2.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
22.78%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 48.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.78%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 17.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.87%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.05%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 16.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
21.62%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 16.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.64%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.