PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.81%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.85%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.60%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.08%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.24%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.35%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.83%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.61%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.91%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.91%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
9.05%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.15%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.09%
EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 95.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.32%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 88.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.49% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.