PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.23%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.32%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.74%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.08%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.97%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.21%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-23.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
58.07%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.13%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.67%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.