PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.60%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 87.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
16.32%
Cost growth 50-75% of TSM's 24.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-70.88%
Gross profit decline while TSM shows 358.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-62.38%
Margin decline while TSM shows 144.04% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.71%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 36.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.10%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 46.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.28%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 28.19%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.96%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-153.74%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 111.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-154.98%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 19.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-176.56%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 1977.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.91%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 1005.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.42%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 373.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-168.82%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 3425.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-188.92%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 1776.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-170.89%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 362.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-168.40%
Net income decline while TSM shows 1467.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-188.37%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 734.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-167.50%
EPS decline while TSM shows 1460.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-172.00%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 1460.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.05%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 1.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.18%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.