PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-46.40%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 2.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-35.93%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 0.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-61.49%
Gross profit decline while TSM shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.15%
Margin decline while TSM shows 1.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.27%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 5.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
222.24%
Other expenses change of 222.24% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-1.48%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 1.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.40%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 0.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.53%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 1.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-194.81%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 8.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-228.36%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 9.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-408.27%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-675.13%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 2.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.91%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 77.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-379.29%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-621.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 4.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2948.32%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 9.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-339.14%
Net income decline while TSM shows 6.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-546.16%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 4.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-346.43%
EPS decline while TSM shows 6.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-342.86%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 6.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.13%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.