PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
38.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.10%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
39.79%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
33.90%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.51%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
41.06%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.38%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
D&A growth above 1.5x TSM's 3.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-66.18%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 1.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.92%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 1.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.44%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.50%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.42%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-36.35%
Net income decline while TSM shows 3.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of TSM's 2.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-34.78%
EPS decline while TSM shows 3.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.76%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 3.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.87%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.98%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.