PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.78%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.32%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.98%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.94%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.25%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.22%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.87%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.64%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-39.02%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 5.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.76%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
87.46%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.85%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.51%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.47%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.57%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.51%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
217.30%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.84%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.01%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.00%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.75%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.