PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.97%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.31%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.02%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.02%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.86%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.49%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.73%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
67.80%
Interest expense growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.60%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 6.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.09%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.17%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 1.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.76%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.65%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-35.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.11%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.02%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.35%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of TSM's 92.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.97%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.95%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.26%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.75%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.63%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.89%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.