PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.03%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 4.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
24.11%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-70.57%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.42%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 6.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 3.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 9.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-13.75%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 2.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.22%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 9.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-187.27%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 1.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-250.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-218.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-246.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.87%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 3.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-212.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-238.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-313.89%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-202.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-226.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-206.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.98%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-3.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.