PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.03%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-33.25%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
191.95%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
180.63%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.90%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 1.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.86%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 1.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.97%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 3.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.17%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 43.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.65%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 2.97%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
180.68%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
156.94%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.23%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
156.94%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-103.21%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
161.28%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
158.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
166.66%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
160.20%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.87%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.29%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.29%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.