PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.76%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
3.81%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.64%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 7.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.70%
Margin expansion 50-75% of TSM's 6.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.40%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.67%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.68%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 7.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.23%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.91%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 5.68%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
2.96%
D&A growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.95%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-36.72%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.53%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 3.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.86%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 7.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.63%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 6.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.83%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 6.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.45%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 5.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.18%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-21.22%
Net income decline while TSM shows 6.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.42%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 5.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.31%
EPS decline while TSM shows 5.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.54%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 5.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.95%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.97%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.