PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.97%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 1.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.36%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 3.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.44%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.39%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.21%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 4.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
2.55%
Total costs growth 50-75% of TSM's 3.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
362.46%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 47.47%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
5.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.80%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-62.15%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
88.89%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 18335.77%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-38.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
94.78%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 30.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-47.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.92%
EPS decline while TSM shows 14.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.92%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 14.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.84%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.