PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.26%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.69%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 5.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.74%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.11%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.06%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 11.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1323.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.15%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.22%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 4.72%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-11.57%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 15.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.70%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 6.16%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
121.57%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
56.66%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
80.64%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
56.66%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-74.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
74.67%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.48%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.28%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.63%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
52.32%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.08%
EPS change of 77.08% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
72.92%
Diluted EPS change of 72.92% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.54%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.92%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.