PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.07%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.13%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.02%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.87%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.53%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 937.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.57%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-70.24%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 7.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.19%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 1.76%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-16.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.82%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 0.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
79.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 1014.82%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-26.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.76%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 37.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.66%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.09%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.