PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.62%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.03%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 0.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.24%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.71%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 5.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.92%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 136.82%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.12%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 6.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.65%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 1.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.56%
Interest expense growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.45%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.17%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.54%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
525.36%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 49.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-3.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.82%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.08%
Net income decline while TSM shows 12.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.59%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 12.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.69%
EPS decline while TSM shows 12.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 12.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.65%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.