PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.00%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.96%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.44%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.44%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.86%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.81%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 72.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.65%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.48%
Interest expense growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.95%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.61%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.93%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 0.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.81%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.81%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-165.14%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 1189.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.30%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 11.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.31%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 20.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.44%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 101.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.26%
Net income decline while TSM shows 0.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.26%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 8.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.33%
EPS decline while TSM shows 0.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 0.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.