PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.11%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.40%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.64%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.88%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.76%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.66%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 5.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.71%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.49%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.14%
Interest expense growth less than half of TSM's 1.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.23%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 2.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.50%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.65%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.21%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.69%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.48%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.16%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.93%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.82%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.87%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.17%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.