176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.05%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.41%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.38%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.31%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x TSM's 0.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.40%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
250.40%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.10%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.72%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.45%
Interest expense growth less than half of TSM's 3.41%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.75%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 0.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-73.35%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 0.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.36%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 5.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
8.35%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.18%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.07%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.99%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.80%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.80%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 43.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.66%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.82%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.66%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.29%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.