PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.96%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.60%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 7.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.66%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.41%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.66%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-631.91%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 140.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.82%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 8.25%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.35%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 7.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.50%
Similar interest expense growth to TSM's 3.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
0.08%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
224.77%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.41%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.89%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.05%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.