PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.17%
Revenue growth below 50% of TSM's 9.01%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.22%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-2.91%
Gross profit decline while TSM shows 25.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.08%
Margin decline while TSM shows 14.83% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.60%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 8.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.68%
Operating expenses reduction while TSM shows 10.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.33%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.26%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-44.12%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 15.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.14%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 6.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.82%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 29.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.89%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 18.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.14%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 29.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 18.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 179.74%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-80.60%
Net income decline while TSM shows 11.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.63%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 2.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.33%
EPS decline while TSM shows 12.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.33%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 12.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.46%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.11%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.