PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.18%
Similar revenue growth to TSM's 17.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
10.02%
Cost growth 50-75% of TSM's 19.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
15.77%
Similar gross profit growth to TSM's 15.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
2.29%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.81%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 10.77%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
400.00%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.56%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 12.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.48%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 18.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.04%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 1.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
129.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 10.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.34%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
222.37%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 16.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
184.82%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
240.28%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 15.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
200.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-102.17%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
846.15%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
735.95%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 13.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
746.15%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 33.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
746.15%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 33.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.18%
Share count change of 0.18% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.62%
Diluted share change of 1.62% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.