176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.69%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.83%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.77%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 3.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of TSM's 3.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.56%
R&D growth 50-75% of TSM's 6.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.99%
Similar operating expenses growth to TSM's 5.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
5.99%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.17%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 0.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.30%
Similar EBITDA growth to TSM's 2.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
5.10%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.86%
Similar operating income growth to TSM's 3.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-4.19%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 2.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.27%
Similar pre-tax income growth to TSM's 3.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-3.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 2.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4700.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 24.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-15.85%
Net income decline while TSM shows 0.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.62%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 0.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.64%
EPS decline while TSM shows 0.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 0.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.96%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.