PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.13%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.92%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.22%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.22%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.78%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.02%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.50%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.25%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.26%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.87%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.99%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.19%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.87%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.78%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.61%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.84%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
248.28%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 50.59%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.99%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.64%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.84%
Share count change of 0.84% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-1.25%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.