PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.62%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 10.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.79%
Cost growth less than half of TSM's 6.99%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-4.50%
Gross profit decline while TSM shows 14.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.93%
Margin decline while TSM shows 4.16% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.20%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.78%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.82%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 5.11%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
2.82%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 6.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.51%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.40%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 6.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.66%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 18.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.25%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 7.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43.75%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-9.99%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 18.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 7.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.91%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 102.66%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.50%
Net income decline while TSM shows 8.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
EPS decline while TSM shows 8.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 8.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count change of 0.17% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.