176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.86%
Revenue growth below 50% of TSM's 21.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.76%
Similar cost growth to TSM's 11.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-2.73%
Gross profit decline while TSM shows 34.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.51%
Margin decline while TSM shows 10.56% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.13%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 12.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.50%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 14.95%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.99%
Total costs growth 50-75% of TSM's 12.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.14%
Interest expense growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.25%
D&A growth while TSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.10%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 15.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.56%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 41.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.22%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 16.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.39%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 39.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.06%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 14.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-288.61%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
11.72%
Net income growth below 50% of TSM's 51.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.68%
Net margin growth below 50% of TSM's 24.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.33%
EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 51.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 51.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.33%
Share count change of 0.33% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.