176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.68%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 8.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.79%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 2.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-37.17%
Gross profit decline while TSM shows 14.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.36%
Margin decline while TSM shows 5.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.94%
Similar R&D growth to TSM's 6.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 2761.16%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.79%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of TSM's 10.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-9.99%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.71%
D&A growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.16%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-64.26%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 6.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.57%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 15.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.09%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 6.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
30.43%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 2.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-70.03%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 14.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 5.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.09%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 13.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.90%
Net income decline while TSM shows 14.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.50%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 6.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.90%
EPS decline while TSM shows 14.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.06%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 14.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.