PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.81%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 0.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.28%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.26%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.41%
R&D reduction while TSM shows 2.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 10.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.29%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 3.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.52%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 3.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
108.33%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.94%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 3.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.77%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 14.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.47%
Net income decline while TSM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.69%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 2.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.13%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.33%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.