PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.02%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.96%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 5.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.32%
Margin expansion below 50% of TSM's 2.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.49%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 3.75%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-340.91%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 139.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.52%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 7.25%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.44%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.69%
D&A growth above 1.5x TSM's 2.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.91%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.28%
EBITDA margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.19%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.34%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 2.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-218.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.61%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.93%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-179.31%
Tax expense reduction while TSM shows 74.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.88%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.26%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 5.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.71%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 5.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.20%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.28%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.