PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.44%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.06%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.64%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.19%
Margin expansion while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.37%
R&D growth while TSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.47%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 7593.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.92%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.43%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 329.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.48%
Interest expense growth less than half of TSM's 29.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x TSM's 2.55%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-31.78%
EBITDA decline while TSM shows 629.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.48%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of TSM's 750.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-37.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
40.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 141.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-37.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 1.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
235.51%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-46.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.83%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% while TSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.