PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.11%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
32.62%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-46.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 6.41%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 8.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 5.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.46%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.41%
Interest expense reduction while TSM shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.17%
Similar D&A growth to TSM's 12.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-58.41%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.12%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 0.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
61.90%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-196.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-59.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.