176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.53%
Revenue decline while TSM shows 13.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.32%
Cost reduction while TSM shows 12.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.99%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of TSM's 14.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
23.19%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.60%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.63%
R&D growth less than half of TSM's 22.73%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 20.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-14.10%
Total costs reduction while TSM shows 14.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.41%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 18.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
18.08%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 15.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
33.47%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.44%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 12.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.14%
Operating margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 20.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.05%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 12.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
45.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.98%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.66%
Net income growth below 50% of TSM's 16.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.17%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 2.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.85%
EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 16.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.85%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 16.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.68%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.