176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.86%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.70%
Cost increase while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
21.26%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.02%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.94%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.05%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.68%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.36%
Total costs growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.13%
Interest expense growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.86%
D&A reduction while TSM shows 5.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
49.38%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.82%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 4.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
70.38%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.35%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
115.63%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
71.51%
Pre-tax income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.30%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
231.75%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 3.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
44.48%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.56%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.61%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.86%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Share count reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.