176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.34%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 11.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
32.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.62%
Similar gross profit growth to TSM's 10.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-4.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.60%
R&D growth above 1.5x TSM's 8.37%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.44%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 8.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.69%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.61%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 122.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
11.01%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TSM's 44.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.75%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 30.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.25%
Operating income growth 50-75% of TSM's 13.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-4.42%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 2.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
54.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 24.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.20%
Similar pre-tax income growth to TSM's 14.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-3.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 2.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 36.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.54%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 10.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 10.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.67%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 10.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.17%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.17%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.