PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.78%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 11.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
19.56%
Cost growth above 1.5x TSM's 11.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.87%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 10.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.71%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x TSM's 8.37%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.03%
Operating expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x TSM's 8.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.39%
D&A growth less than half of TSM's 122.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.97%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TSM's 44.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.70%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 30.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.31%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 13.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.45%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TSM's 2.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-21.85%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 24.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.14%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x TSM's 14.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 2.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.99%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 36.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.33%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 10.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 10.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.42%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 10.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.