PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
8.79%
Cost growth of 8.79% versus flat Semiconductors costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
12.17%
Positive growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
1.86%
Margin change of 1.86% versus flat Semiconductors margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
20.07%
R&D change of 20.07% versus flat Semiconductors spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.13%
Operating expenses change of 17.13% versus flat Semiconductors costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
10.92%
Total costs change of 10.92% versus flat Semiconductors costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.43%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 1.60%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
7.41%
EBITDA growth while Semiconductors declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2.46%
EBITDA margin decline while Semiconductors median is -6.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.58%
Operating income growth while Semiconductors declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-3.22%
Operating margin decline while Semiconductors median is -23.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
42.92%
Other expenses growth while Semiconductors reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
10.65%
Income change of 10.65% versus flat Semiconductors. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.48%
Margin change of 0.48% versus flat Semiconductors. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
10.64%
Tax expense growth while Semiconductors reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
10.66%
Net income growth while Semiconductors declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
0.49%
Margin change of 0.49% versus flat Semiconductors. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-11.11%
EPS decline while Semiconductors median is -8.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.67%
Diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
22.61%
Share count reduction below 50% of Semiconductors median of 0.02%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.61%
Diluted share change of 0.61% versus stable Semiconductors. Walter Schloss would verify approach.