PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while Technology median is 3.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-2.20%
Cost reduction while Technology median is 2.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-5.87%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is 4.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-2.60%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
9.86%
R&D change of 9.86% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.07%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
0.95%
Total costs growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.40%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.83%
D&A change of 2.83% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-84.09%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 3.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-38.88%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-84.09%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 4.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-83.54%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.37%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-76.02%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 3.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.02%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-76.02%
Net income decline while Technology median is 6.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.19%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-72.73%
EPS decline while Technology median is 2.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.98%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.65%
Share count change of 0.65% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.