PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.97%
Positive growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
0.31%
Cost growth of 0.31% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
4.02%
Positive growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
2.02%
Margin change of 2.02% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.86%
R&D change of 0.86% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.49%
Operating expenses change of 1.49% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
0.73%
Total costs growth while Technology reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
67.80%
Interest expense change of 67.80% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-1.60%
D&A reduction while Technology median is -1.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-27.09%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is -6.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-29.17%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is -3.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
9.76%
Operating income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
7.65%
Margin change of 7.65% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-35.16%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
8.11%
Income change of 8.11% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
6.02%
Margin change of 6.02% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
57.35%
Tax expense change of 57.35% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
4.97%
Net income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
2.95%
Margin change of 2.95% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5.26%
EPS change of 5.26% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1.75%
Diluted EPS growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1.63%
Share count change of 1.63% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
2.89%
Diluted share change of 2.89% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.