PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.62%
Revenue decline while Technology median is -2.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-5.03%
Cost reduction while Technology median is -3.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-2.43%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is -2.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
1.24%
Margin change of 1.24% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.71%
R&D reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.92%
Other expenses change of 207.92% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
0.12%
Operating expenses growth while Technology reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-2.65%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is -2.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
44.56%
Interest expense change of 44.56% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
0.45%
D&A change of 0.45% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-1.17%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is -5.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
2.54%
EBITDA margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-7.22%
Operating income decline while Technology median is -7.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.74%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is -2.95%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
525.36%
Other expenses change of 525.36% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-3.32%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is -3.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.31%
Margin change of 0.31% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
21.82%
Tax expense growth while Technology reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-7.08%
Net income decline while Technology median is -5.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.59%
Net margin decline while Technology median is -0.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.69%
EPS decline while Technology median is -2.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.76%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is -3.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.65%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.20%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.